Legal Opinion

Lancaster Development, Inc. v. Power Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Casey, J.

Appeal from that part of a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hughes, J.), entered January 28, 1988 in Schoharie County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motions to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

In 1987 petitioner and respondent Sweet Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Sweet), together with two other companies, submitted bids on the Blenheim-Gilboa Power Project in Schoharie County in response to a request by respondent Power Authority of the State of New York (hereinafter PASNY). Although petitioner was the lowest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plumbing, Heating, Piping & Air Conditioning Contractors Ass'n v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. MacFarland-Breakell Building Corp. v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. M. Kramer & Sons, Inc. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Club v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madison Square Garden v. New York Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Santora v. SilverNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mylod v. PatakiNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API