Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guynn v. Wabash Water & Light Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1914No. 22,516Published

From Grant Superior Court; Robert M. VanAtta, Judge. Action by Katherine M. Guynn against the Wabash Water and Light Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Cox, J.

I understand from the opinion .of the majority of the court that the judgment is reversed on the ground that the trial court’s conclusions of law from the facts found were erroneous. I cannot concur in the reversal on that ground. The theory of appellant’s complaint both for damages and injunction was, as appears from its allegations, that “said dam obstructs the flow of the water in said creek, and flows the same back onto appellant’s land and destroys the crops and grass growing thereon, and backs the water on same in such a manner that it destroys the quality of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guynn v. Wabash Water & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API