Legal Opinion

State v. Enrique D.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

Respondent Enrique D. has an extensive history of sex offenses. In July 2009, as Enrique D. neared release from prison, *943where he had most recently been serving a sentence of 2 to 4 years for attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 130.65, 110.00), petitioner State of New York commenced this civil management proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. At the ensuing jury trial to determine whether Enrique D. suffered from a mental abnormality,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of State of New York v. James K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Matter of State of New York v. Lionel W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. T., CHARADA v. STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Matter of Charles L. v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. Matter of Raymond E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API