Legal Opinion

Payne v. Bevel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1923No. 12183PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

This action was brought by defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant. The action is for damages caused to plaintiff’s crop and land by overflow caused by a railroad embankment which changed the natural, course of water and caused the overflow of plaintiff’s land. The defendant set up in its answer, among other things, a plea of res' judicata, wherein it says that in a former suit by William McDaniel, the then owner of the title to said land, against Charles Schaff, the receiver of properties of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Aldworth v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peacock v. Sundre TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API