Legal Opinion
In Re Darrel v. Shank, Debtor. Darrel v. Shank v. Washington State Department of Revenue, Excise Tax Division, Defendant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1986No. 85-4042PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
792 F.2d 829
14 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 893, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,197
In re Darrel V. SHANK, Debtor.
Darrel V. SHANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, EXCISE TAX DIVISION,
Defendant- Appellant.
No. 85-4042.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 6, 1986.
Decided June 18, 1986.
Kary L. Krismer, Bruce T. Thurston, Woodley & Thurston, Kirkland, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.
James R. Tuttle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., for defendant-appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.
Before WRIGHT, TANG and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re John Arthur Rosenow v. State of Illinois, Department of Revenue, in Re Robert M. Hull v. State of Illinois, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Tapp v. Fairbanks North Star Borough (In Re Tapp)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1981
- In Re Darrel v. Shank, Debtor. Darrel v. Shank v. Washington State Department of Revenue, Excise Tax Division, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re BoydUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- DeChiaro v. New York State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ilko v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011