Legal Opinion

Burt v. Kinne

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 15, 1867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit on the general counts, for money lent and advanced to, paid, laid out and expended for, money had and received by, interest on money due from, for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to, and services and labor done and performed and materials provided for defendants at said defendants’ request.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit on the general counts, for money lent and advanced to, paid, laid out and expended for, money had and received by, interest on money due from, for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to, and services and labor done and performed and materials provided for defendants at said defendants’ request. Under general leave to amend, obtained at a former term, the plaintiff at this term filed amendments, one being a special count on a lease, and another upon an account annexed. These amendments were objected to, more particularly the first, and they were disallowed by the court,…

1Opinion of the CourtBellows, J.

The special count offered by way of amendment is for breach of defendant’s stipulations in a lease of a farm, he being the tenant of the plaintiff’s, and the damages sought to be recovered are unliquidated. The breaches alleged are that defendant did not carry on the farm in a husbandlike manner, did not repair the fences or buildings, did not harvest all the crops in good order, and deliver one half of the same to the plaintiff, did not tend and manage the stock in a husband-like manner, and others of a similar character; and we think this matter is wholly inconsistent with the original…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894
  2. Mt. Washington Hotel Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API