Legal Opinion

Puliz v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1935No. 25773. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

September 4,1931, Joe Puliz, a Slovakian upwards of forty years of age, and a strong, powerful workman, suffered an injury in the course of his employment as the result of being* struck by a heavy steel rail which he and others were lifting. He received a hard blow just above the left testicle, and, after about ten days hospitalization, this testicle, which had been severely injured, was removed. In due time, the workman was discharged from the hospital and was allowed by the department sixty days time loss and a ten degrees disability. About two months thereafter, he attempted to resume…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Taylor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Maddox v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Maddox v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Noll v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Olympia Brewing Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. MacVeigh v. Division of Unemployment CompensationWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Tennyson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Winningham v. OlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Smith v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API