Anderson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
James Lonnie Anderson has filed here his petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Anderson v. State.
The State, acting by and through its Attorney General, has filed a motion to strike Anderson’s petition for writ of certiorari on the ground that there has been no compliance with Rule 36 of the Rules of Practice of this court, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, in that said petition, as filed, is not on transcript paper.
The State’s motion to strike is well taken and must be granted. The petition, as alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Duckett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Accardo v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.