Legal Opinion

Eureka Knitting Co. v. Snyder

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1908No. Appeal, No. 204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 204, Oct. T., 1907, by defendants, from order of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1907, No. 29, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Eureka Knitting Company, Limited, to the use of Harry Deibert, to the use of John A. Sprenger, v. Charles P. Snyder and Wm. Seifert, trading as Snyder & Seifert. Replevin for a boiler and engine.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 204, Oct. T., 1907, by defendants, from order of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1907, No. 29, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Eureka Knitting Company, Limited, to the use of Harry Deibert, to the use of John A. Sprenger, v. Charles P. Snyder and Wm. Seifert, trading as Snyder & Seifert. Replevin for a boiler and engine. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiff in this action of replevin filed a statement *339averring that the Eureka Knitting Company, Limited, was, on April 22, 1905, the owner and in possession of an engine and boiler and on said day delivered the same, to the defendants under a written contract of bailment for the period of ten months, for the. sum of $200, $50.00 of which was paid upon the execution of the contract, and the defendants covenanted to pay ten installments of $15.00 each on the twenty-second day of each month, beginning with May 22, 1905; the said contract further provided, that at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. CochranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Johnson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Russell v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  4. Appleby v. BarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Standard Repair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. McKeesport Beer Distributors, Inc. v. All Brand Importers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Family Budget Plan, Inc. v. Ede, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1955
  4. Travelers Hotel Co. v. Yorke, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1928
  5. Wagner v. PrettymanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API