Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. Joseph Greenspon's Son Pipe Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.A., secs. 201-219).

The plaintiffs are William F. Niehaus and Carrie Niehaus, his wife, who sue as former employees of defendant, Joseph Greenspon's Son Pipe Corporation, to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and a reasonable attorney's fee, all as provided by the act. Though the plaintiffs have joined in the action, each purports to assert his or her own individual right of recovery; and the case originates in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis as a court of competent…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schimerowski v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Christensen v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1951
  3. Dover v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Corn v. United American Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1952
  5. Ashenford v. L. Yukon & Sons Produce Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API