Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1927No. 17838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In this proceeding to eject an intruder, under the Civil Code (1910), § 5380, the court allowed the counter-affidavit to be amended. The only exception to this ruling is contained in the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. A ruling allowing an amendment to the pleadings can not be made a ground of the motion for a new trial. Simmons v. Lanford, 21 Ga. App. 686 (94 S. E. 907).

2. The amendment was to allow the insertion of- the word “legal” between the words “the” and “right,” as they appeared in the counter-affidavit. *817No motion to continue tlie case was made on tlie ground of surprise (as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Foreman v. PelhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Simmons v. LanfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Sheats v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Bagley v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SherwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Charles v. SegarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Insurance Co. v. DillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Charles v. SegarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API