Hunter v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. In this proceeding to eject an intruder, under the Civil Code (1910), § 5380, the court allowed the counter-affidavit to be amended. The only exception to this ruling is contained in the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. A ruling allowing an amendment to the pleadings can not be made a ground of the motion for a new trial. Simmons v. Lanford, 21 Ga. App. 686 (94 S. E. 907).
2. The amendment was to allow the insertion of- the word “legal” between the words “the” and “right,” as they appeared in the counter-affidavit. *817No motion to continue tlie case was made on tlie ground of surprise (as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Foreman v. PelhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Simmons v. LanfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Sheats v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Bagley v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bradley v. SherwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Charles v. SegarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Insurance Co. v. DillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Charles v. SegarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972