Sewell v. Xpress Lube
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PARRISH,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
1 Xpress Lube appeals from the district court's order denying its motion to set aside a default judgment in favor of Larry Sewell. Sewell fell into a service pit at Xpress Lube, which is a sole proprietorship of Bruce Anderson. Sewell alleged injuries resulting from the fall, and his attorney thereafter began negotiating with Travelers Insurance (Travelers), Anderson's insurance carrier. When negotiations proved unsuccessful, Se-well filed suit, naming Xpress Lube as the only defendant.
{2 A process server left copies of the summons and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Canyon Country Store v. BraceyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Novosad v. Cunningham, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Asset Acceptance LLC v. StocksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Gillman v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Go Invest Wisely LLC v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Tops Well Services v. Goodrich Mud CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Lewis v. U.S. Bank TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.