Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Xpress Lube

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2013No. 20120445PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 Xpress Lube appeals from the district court's order denying its motion to set aside a default judgment in favor of Larry Sewell. Sewell fell into a service pit at Xpress Lube, which is a sole proprietorship of Bruce Anderson. Sewell alleged injuries resulting from the fall, and his attorney thereafter began negotiating with Travelers Insurance (Travelers), Anderson's insurance carrier. When negotiations proved unsuccessful, Se-well filed suit, naming Xpress Lube as the only defendant.

{2 A process server left copies of the summons and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Canyon Country Store v. BraceyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Novosad v. Cunningham, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Asset Acceptance LLC v. StocksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. Gillman v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Go Invest Wisely LLC v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. Tops Well Services v. Goodrich Mud CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  5. Lewis v. U.S. Bank TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API