Legal Opinion

Maes v. Audubon Indemnity Insurance Group

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2007No. 29,624PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Justice.

{1} Cora Maes (“Maes”) sued her property insurer, Audubon Indemnity Insurance Group (“Audubon”), after it originally denied her insurance claim for destroyed property. Audubon asserted immunity from suit on the basis that Maes obtained her insurance with Audubon through the New Mexico Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan Act (“FAIR Plan Act” or “the Act”), NMSA 1978, §§ 59A-29-1 to -9 (1985, as amended through 1999), which provides statutory immunity from suit for certain parties with respect to certain actions taken pursuant to the FAIR Plan Act. Section 59A-29-7…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Peña v. GreffetDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  3. Reule Sun Corp. v. VallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. StrauchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Alfaro-Huitron v. WKI Outsourcing SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API