Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Breitling
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Under the provisions of section 8967, Code 1923, appellant’s suit commenced upon the filing of his complaint in the office of the clerk, and the result of this appeal turns upon the proper construction of this statute.
Confessedly, the complaint was not filed in the clerk’s office on the date insisted upon in this proceeding, but was placed in the mail and remained at the post office, doubtless in the post office box of the clerk. As pointed out by the authorities, the word “file” is derived from the Latin word “filum,” a thread, and its application is drawn from the ancient practice of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- United States v. LombardoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
- Commonwealth v. O'Bryan, Utley & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Claim of Cheesman v. CheesmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Piersol v. State Ex Rel. County Atty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perry v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Crawford v. Ray & Pearman Lincoln MercuryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Collins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
- Campbell v. Mason, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Ex Parte JettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.