Legal Opinion
CRESCI v. MCNAMARA
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 28, 2024No. 2:18-cv-16207Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PETER J. CRESCI, No. 18cv16207 (EP) (JSA) Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY J. MCNAMARA, et al., Defendants. PETER J. CRESCI, No. 13cv4695 (EP) (AME) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM ORDER JOARRIE AQUINO, et al., Defendants. PADIN, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Peter J. Cresci has two pending matters before the undersigned. In Cresci v. McNamara, et al., No. 18-16207 (the “OAE Case”), he alleges Defendants Timothy J. McNamara, Charles Centinaro, and the Office of Attorney Ethics (“OAE”) filed ethics charges and suspended his law license in retaliation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Evan Alexander ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Rippo v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.