Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance v. Solaman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

James J. Brucia, J.

This litigation arises as a result of plaintiff, Government Employees Insurance Company (Geico), instituting the within declaratory judgment action that there was no policy of automobile liability and physical damage with collision coverage in effect on December 21, 1990 covering a 1987 Nissan owned by defendant Anita Solaman (Solaman).

On December 21, 1990 the defendant Henry A. Heuer (Heuer) operating his vehicle and defendant Bernadette Apanah (Apanah) operating Solaman’s 1987 Nissan were involved in a motor vehicle accident. In underlying actions in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Johnson v. General Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Glens Falls Insurance v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Primeau v. National Life Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Glens Falls Insurance v. United States Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Regent Abstract Services, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API