Legal Opinion
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc. v. Nixon
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 9, 2004No. 99-04231-CV-C-SOWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 84), which is fully briefed. Plaintiffs’ motion requires this Court to assess the constitutionality of the Missouri Infant’s Protection Act, Mo. Rev.Stat. § 565.300 (WESTLAW through 2004 legislation). The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914, 120 S.Ct. 2597, 147 L.Ed.2d 743 (2000), compels the conclusion that the Missouri Infant’s Protection Act violates the United States Constitution. Accordingly, this Court grants plaintiffs’ Motion for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Herbert Holmes, M.D. v. John Farmer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Stella A. Dush v. Appleton Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Peter Donovan v. Harrah's Maryland Heights Corporation, a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carhart v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Richmond Medical Center for Women v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- LeRoy Carhart v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc. Ex Rel. Crist v. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Richmond Medical Center For Women v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.