Legal Opinion
People v. Schunk
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1991No. F014550PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARTIN, Acting P. J.
—Respondent, Robert Henry Schunk, was charged with possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359). On *1336April 18, 1990, through counsel, respondent filed a motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5. After several continuances because of respondent’s failure to appear at the suppression motion, the motion was denied by the trial court “without prejudice.”
On July 23, 1990, after a change of counsel, respondent filed a second motion to dismiss under Penal Code section 1538.5. After an evidentiary hearing on August 2, 1990, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BautistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. SoteloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. SoteloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996