J.L.T. v. State

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge

After engaging in criminal mischief as a Class D felony,1 an act that would be a criminal offense if committed by an adult,2 J.L.T. was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent. He now appeals raising six issues for our review which we consolidate and rephrase as follows: 1) was the evidence sufficient to sustain the delinquency judgment; 2) was J.L.T. denied effective assistance of counsel; 3) did the trial judge engage in judicial misconduct thereby depriving J.L.T. of a fair trial; and 4) was the trial court’s order of restitution erroneous.

We affirm.3

The facts most favorable…