Legal Opinion

Reliance Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 13, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

What we have here is a controversy between insurance companies as to the meaning of two standard clauses in comprehensive automobile liability insurance policies: (1) the tractor-trailer exclusion and (2) the severability of interests clause.

Not surprisingly, the parties have, in their briefs and arguments, engaged in lusty word chopping, an exercise to which the language of the policies lends itself handsomely. We think that diagnosing the commercial purpose of the disputed provisions offers a more hopeful approach to unraveling the problem. To that end we describe the business setting.

*219Aetna…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnstable County Mutual Fire Insurance v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. City of Boston v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Ratner v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co. Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Bankers & Shippers Insurance Co. of New York v. WatsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Hardberger and Smylie, a Co-Partnership, and William H. Rabe v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reliance Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API