Legal Opinion

Cathers v. Barnes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered December 24, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion to vacate the note of issue, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered March 2, 2004, which denied defendants’ motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action for breach of contract and for goods sold and accepted, defendants’ motion to vacate the note of issue was denied because discovery was completed (compare Ortiz v Arias, 285 AD2d 390 [2001]), and the note had been filed in conformity with prior scheduling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ulico Casualty Co. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Ortiz v. AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BDCM Fund Adviser, L.L.C. v. ZenniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Badia v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. BDCM Fund Adviser, L.L.C. v. ZenniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Gaul v. Cool Insuring Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API