Legal Opinion

Forest Kirst v. Ottosen Propeller Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 14, 2019No. 18-35830Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUG 14 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOREST KIRST; TRACEY KIRST, and No. 18-35830 the marital community composed thereof, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00188-TMB Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEMORANDUM* OTTOSEN PROPELLER & ACCESSORIES, INC., an Arizona Corporation; HARTZELL PROPELLER, INC., an Ohio Corporation; THE OTTOSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION, an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding Argued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lippi v. City BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Widmyer v. Southeast Skyways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Shanks v. Upjohn Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hiller v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., USAAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API