Legal Opinion

Village of Attica v. Day

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles B. Wheeler, Official Referee.

Prior to the adoption of certain zoning ordinances by the village of Attica, the defendants had installed and operated a service station for the purpose of supplying gasoline to motor vehicles. The tanks containing *883gasoline for this purpose had all been placed below the surface of the ground. This action, however, in no way relates to such tanks but to another later placed on the premises.

The village trustees later adopted certain zoning ordinances and the service station operated by the defendants fell within the so-called industrial district.

After the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Hinman v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Salmon v. Rochester & Lake Ontario Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Walker v. FuhrmanNew York Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Lockwood v. Village of Buchanan, New York County Courts1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API