Legal Opinion

Booye v. Muth

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1903Published

On error to the Atlantic Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

In this case the parties submitted matters in dispute between them to arbitrators for settlement, and, by their agreement, their submission was-made a rule of court, in accordance with the statute. The arbitrators having made their award, Muth, the plaintiff in error, moved the Circuit Court to set it aside for certain reasons, which he then specified. The court, on the hearing of the application, considering that none of the reasons assigned were meritorious, denied the motion and confirmed the award. The rule entered pursuant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trent Tile Co. v. Fort Dearborn Nationak BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API