Flanigan v. General Electric Co.

RULING

ARTERTON, District Judge.

I. Procedural and Factual Background tO CO CO

A. Facts Relating to Prudence Challenge to T-Bill Investment (Count III) tO CO CO

B. Facts Relating to Failure to Provide Information Claim (Count I). tO

1. Information Provided to Plaintiffs . tO

2. Plaintiffs’ Evidence that Martin and GE had decided on benefits prior to March 23,1993 disclosure. BO 5^ CO

C. Facts Relating to Partial Termination Claim (Count II) t>0 Ol O

TT. Standard . 250

TTT. Discussion. . .251

A. Prudence Attack on T-Bill Investment (Count III) — Martin’s Motion for Summary Judgment. lO

1. Martin’s…