Legal Opinion

Heydorf v. Conrack

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 31, 1898No. 288PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Marshall district court; R. B. Spilman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*203The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J. :

On the 27th day of July, 1896, John Heydorf was a member of and the holder of a beneficiary certificate in the Knights and Ladies of Security, a beneficiary society, the chief governing authority of which is a national council, located at Topeka, Kan., the subordinate council of which he was a member being located at St. Joseph, Mo. The beneficiary certificate was made payable in case of death to the heirs of John Heydorf, without naming them.. He was sick in a hospital in St. Joseph, Mo., and was visited by J. H. Johnson, a member of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Titsworth v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. Olmstead v. Masonic Mutual Benefit SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. LowtherColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Independent Foresters v. KeliherOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Wentworth v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Garrett v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Grand Lodge, Knights & Daughters of Tabor v. VannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API