Legal Opinion
United States v. Ferguson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 31, 2008No. Criminal 3:06CR137 (CFD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON LOSS CALCULATION, VICTIM ENHANCEMENT, AND RESTITUTION
CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge.
The Superseding Indictment charged defendants Ferguson, Graham, Milton, and Monrad with one count of conspiracy, seven counts of securities fraud, five counts of making false statements to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and three counts of mail fraud, and charged defendant Garand with one count of conspiracy, three counts of securities fraud, three counts of making false statements to the SEC, and three counts of mail fraud. The charges resulted from a fraudulent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Bernard J. EbbersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. OlisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RutkoskeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Glickenhaus & Company v. Household International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- In re American International Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. Keith BermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025