Legal Opinion
Matter of Bogold v. Bogold Brothers, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The Appellate Division has remitted the claim to the State Industrial Board merely to reinstate the award to respondent in accordance with the opinions of the Appellate Division. No further hearing is contemplated. Appellant on the argument stipulates for such award in case of affirmance. The order may be regarded as a final order or an order for anew trial with stipulation for judgment absolute and subject to review in this court.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed, etc.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Manning v. Stroh & Wilson, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Claim of Dodson v. S. A. Healey Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Claim of Graham v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Claim of Millon v. Ideal Wet Wash Laundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Claim of Shanley v. Slattery Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.