Legal Opinion

Dedman v. Scarce

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 1875Published

APPEAL, FROM WOODFORD CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The paper copied into the record, and termed by the clerk the “Bill of Exceptions,” lacks the signature of the judge who presided upon the trial of the action. In this condition it does not conform to the provisions of Sec. 367, Civil Code of Practice. The defect is one of substance, and not merely of form.

The order of court, showing that appellant tendered a bill of exceptions, which was signed by the court and ordered to be filed and made a part of the record herein, neither cures the defect, nor authorizes this court to treat the paper as a bill of exceptions. As…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelsoe v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849
  2. Allsup v. HassettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API