Legal Opinion

Smoot v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 29, 1989No. 3 Div. 832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

Charles Smoot appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P. (Temp.), as amended April 1, 1987. This petition was denied, following the appointment of counsel and a full evidentiary hearing being held on the merits of the petitioner’s allegations. This hearing was in conformity with the rules of procedure as above noted.

Briefs have now been filed on the allegations raised by appellate counsel.

In reviewing this record, we find that the trial court failed to make specific findings on the merits of the allegations raised at the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Hellums v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Smoot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Ex parte Wayne Holleman Travis. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Wayne Holleman Travis v. State of Alabama) (Conecuh Circuit Court: CC-92-4.60 Criminal Appeals: CR-18-0973).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API