Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Harmon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Multnomah County: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. Suit by R. J. Rowland against W. L. Harmon, a prop-= erty owner, and Kill am & Lewton, his contractors) to foreclose a lien for labor and materials. From a decree for plaintiff, W. L. Harmon appeals.

1Per curiam

This is a suit in equity to foreclose a mechanics’ lien upon the lots described in the complaint. The facts show that during the year 1892 the defendant William L. Harmon entered into a contract with the defendants Killam & Lewton, as copartners, by the terms of which they undertook to erect for him a dwelling house upon lots eighteen and nineteen for the sum specified; that while constructing said building they entered into a contract with the plaintiff Rowland to furnish the material and do the plastering and foundation work of said house for the sum of four hundred and twenty dollars; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nicolai v. Van FridaghOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allen v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bartels v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Columbia River Door Co. v. ToddOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HewittOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hume v. Seattle Dock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API