Legal Opinion

Derek Andrew Inc. v. Poof Apparel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2008No. 07-35048Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Poof Apparel Corporation appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to set aside entry of default and the court’s award to Plaintiff Derek Andrew, Inc., of $685,807.70 in disgorged profits under the Lanham Act and Washington Consumer Protection Act. The relevant facts are set forth in an opinion filed this date.

1. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to set aside an entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c). Yusov v. Yusuf, 892 F.2d 784, 787 (9th Cir.1989). We find no abuse of discretion here, because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. Donald C. Hayhurst Jane Doe HayhurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Edgar H.W. Lum v. City and County of Honolulu, Edgar H.W. Lum v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Yusov v. YusufCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API