Barrett v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial.- The facts are stated in the opinion of trie court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Action for damages for the forcible ejection of plaintiff from one of defendant’s cars. The. defense was, that the plaintiff had refused to pay his fare, and that therefore the defendant was justified in ejecting him. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals upon the findings.
The 'material portions of the findings are as follows:—». “That while in said car as such passenger, and when said car was near the corner of Second and Market, streets, the conductor in charge of said car, on behalf of the defendant, did, in the course of his employment as such…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Barker v. Central Park, North & East River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Cisco & N. E. Ry. Co. v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Muldowney v. Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Wynn v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.