Herrington v. City of Valdosta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. This court “can not determine whether a refusal to sanction a petition for certiorari was or was not erroneous, where a! copy of the petition is neither embodied in the bill of exceptions nor attached thereto and verified by the judge. Such petition, not having been sanctioned, could not be lawfully filed, and therefore was no part of the record, and could not be brought rrp as such. Elsas v. Clay, 67 Ga. 327; James v. Davis, 76 Ga. 100; Fleming v. City of Bainbridge, 84 Ga. 622” (10 S. E. 1098). Lake v. Kellum, 99 Ga. 130 (24 S. E. 874).
2. “The fact that a judge of the superior court to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Elsas v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Wood v. County of TattnallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Lake v. KellumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.