Legal Opinion

Henderson v. GlobalLab Solutions, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided August 26, 2015No. CASE NO. 5:11-CV-05253Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now pending before the Court is Defendants GlobalLab Solutions, Inc. and Tyler Freeman, MD’s (collectively, “GlobalLab”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial, or Remittitur (Doe. 143), to which *402Plaintiffs Melissa Henderson and Dana Jones submitted a Response in Opposition (Doe. 145), and GlobalLab filed a Reply (Doc. 147). For the reasons explained herein, Global-Lab’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Melissa Henderson and Dana Jones filed a Complaint in October of 2011…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. MBM Co., Inc. v. CounceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hetzel v. Prince William CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Max Slatton, Jr., Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc., D/B/A Eby and Associates of Arkansas, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API