Legal Opinion
General Securities Co. v. City of Hammond
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1929No. 496PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.
Plaintiff in this suit appears in the capacity of transferee and subrogee of a claim for damages against the city of Hammond and Tangipahoa drainage district No. 1, which it acquired from Roy 0. Bankston, and therefore, for the purposes of this suit, stands in the shoes of said Roy O. Bankston, with all of his rights and obligations, so far as the defendants are concerned.
It appears that on the night of January 15; 1927, at about 12 o’clock, Bankston’s automobile, while being used and operated with his consent by Millard Bankston, a near relative, ran into a drainage canal, which had been dug…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Lopes v. SahuqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Hemming v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Weinhardt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Lapouyade v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clinton v. City of West MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- German v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Mershon v. CutrerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. BowdonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.