Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. St. Charles Savings Bank v. Hall

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This ease comes to the writer upon reassignment. It is an original proceeding in prohibition to prevent the enforcement against relator of an injunction issued out of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Our provisional rule issued. Service thereof was waived and thereafter respondent filed his return. To such return relator has filed its demurrer. Thus the facts appear from the pleadings.

Respondent is judge of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis and was presiding in Division No. 14 thereof when said injunction was granted. Relator is and was a banking corporation organized…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davison v. HoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Reed v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Patton v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Burgess v. O'DonoghueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. Finley v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ford v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Finley v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API