Legal Opinion
Knaus v. Guidry
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 27, 2009No. 1-07-3509PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Joseph Gordon
Defendants appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
In this action, plaintiffs Brian Knaus and Aaron Everson, residents of Florida and Missouri, respectively, contend they were defrauded by the captioned defendants Douglas Erickson, Robert Anderson, Bruce Edwards, the Richum Group, Jerome Carter, PHD Management, L.L.C., Wesley Taylor, the Taylor Group Corporation, Charles C. Guidry, and Charles C. Guidry, EC., in what they describe as an “advance fee scheme.” According to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Russell v. SNFAIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- GOGNAT v. EllsworthColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- McNally v. MorrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Cardenas Marketing Network v. PabonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.