Legal Opinion

Hacker v. Munroe & Son

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 13, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Replevin. In the Circuit Court of Will County; the Hon. Dorrange Dibell, Judge, presiding. The pleadings are stated in the opinion of the court; trial by jury; verdict and judgment for plaintiffs; appeal by defendants. Heard in this court at the May term, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

Hr. Justice Cartwright

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

This is a suit in replevin begun by appellees against appellants for the possession of three boilers and the plates, smoke stacks, valves and attachments belonging thereto. The pleas were non eepit, non detinet, property in defendants, and that the boilers, etc., were fixtures belonging to real estate and buildings owned by defendants designed for a tin plate mill and plant, and therefore not the subject of replevin. To the plea of property in defendants the plaintiffs replied that the property replevied was the property of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kitson v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chandler v. LincolnIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Reynolds v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Constantine v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Blow v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robb v. DobrinskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Maupin Warehouse Co. v. FlemingOregon Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API