Legal Opinion

State of Tennessee v. Triston Lee Harris - Dissenting

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 6, 2008No. M2006-01532-CCA-R3-CDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 17, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TRISTON LEE HARRIS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lawrence County No. 25348 Jim T. Hamilton, Judge No. M2006-01532-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 6, 2008 JOSEPH M. TIPTON , P.J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the conclusion that probable cause did not exist for the search of the defendant. I would hold that the canine’s positive alert on the defendant’s car provided the authorities with probable cause to search the defendant, the car’s driver. I believe United States v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. People v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API