Legal Opinion

Evershed v. Berry

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1968No. 10889Published

1DissentEllett, Justice

(dissenting) :

I dissent. The first case cited in the main opinion (Geo. Benz & Sons v. Willar, 198 Minn. 311, 269 N.W. 840, 109 A.L.R. 443) held that foreclosure of a mortgage terminated the lease of defendants (who held as tenants under the mortgagor) and that “Defendants thereafter remaining in possession were trespassers, or, at best, tenants at will or at sufferance and could have been ejected.” In the instant case if the defendant is a trespasser, he has no rights whatsoever; and if he is a tenant at will or at sufferance, his lease with his landlord (the conditional purchaser) is not to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Utah Savings and Loan Association v. MechamUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Geo. Benz & Sons v. WillarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API