Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 9, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSCN, District Judge.
This is a motion under Rule 56, Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., for summary judgment made by the defendant Renardov, Inc.
There were originally three defendants in the suit. The cause of action against Commercial Union Assurance Co., Ltd. has been discontinued. The cause of action against Dr. Franz S. Cohn has been dismissed by Judge Murphy as a result of a motion for summary judgment.
This leaves only the defendant Renardov, Inc. which makes the present motion.
The action was originally started in the City Court of the City of New York and then was removed to this Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sosnow, Kranz Simcoe, Inc. v. Storatti CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Sosnow, Kranz & Simcoe, Inc. v. Storatti Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Maurice Slater Trucking Co. v. MausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SlifkinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Coast Manufacturing & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- McNeil Construction Company, a Corporation v. The Livingston State Bank, a Montana State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Centennial Insurance v. M/V Constellation EnterpriseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- McDowell Associates, Inc. v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.