Scott v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
A jury convicted Richard Scott of securing the execution of a document by deception. The court assessed his punishment at one year’s confinement in a state jail and a $2,000 fine. Scott represents himself on appeal and has failed to file a brief. We have reviewed the record for unassigned fundamental error, and having found none, we will affirm.
Background
The indictment alleges in pertinent part that Scott:
with intent to defraud and harm another, by deception caused or induced Debbie Rudolph, a public servant, to file or record a purported judgment of a pur ported…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BISSING, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Bonnie Allen Thomas A/K/A Bonnie Ruth Allen Pieroni A/K/A Bonnie Straight v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2025
- Jetmir Nokshiqi v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2022
- Kendrick Marcel Overton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Mary Cathleen Kersh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.