Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided September 28, 2005No. 10-01-00077-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELIPE REYNA, Justice.

A jury convicted Richard Scott of securing the execution of a document by deception. The court assessed his punishment at one year’s confinement in a state jail and a $2,000 fine. Scott represents himself on appeal and has failed to file a brief. We have reviewed the record for unassigned fundamental error, and having found none, we will affirm.

Background

The indictment alleges in pertinent part that Scott:

with intent to defraud and harm another, by deception caused or induced Debbie Rudolph, a public servant, to file or record a purported judgment of a pur ported…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BISSING, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Bonnie Allen Thomas A/K/A Bonnie Ruth Allen Pieroni A/K/A Bonnie Straight v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2025
  3. Jetmir Nokshiqi v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2022
  4. Kendrick Marcel Overton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Mary Cathleen Kersh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API