Valentine v. Healey
New York Supreme Court
Action by Henry C. Valentine against Warren H. Healey and others for rent. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff moves for a new trial, on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
The plaintiff and the defendant Healey are the owners of premises situated in West Forty-Third street, *247in the city of New York, as tenants in common; the plaintiff being the owner of three undivided fourths thereof, and the defendant Healey being the owner of one undivided fourth. In May,1891, the defendants Healey and Zabriskie were copartners in business, under the firm name of Healey & Co., in a limited partnership; the said defendants being the general partners, and one Williams the special partner. In said month the plaintiff and the defendant Healey, as parties of the first part, leased…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hawkins v. Trustees of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- McKay & Blakeslee v. MumfordNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Dresser v. DresserNew York Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by4 opinions
- Valentine v. . HealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Valentine v. HealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Valentine v. . HealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Valentine v. HealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896