Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Deffenbaugh

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,.(after stating the facts). Under the facts stated, the court erred in instructing the jury that the plaintiffs were entitled to the ungathered crops on the mortgaged premises at the time they were dispossessed. The law is that the mortgagee, having purchased the mortgaged premises at a foreclosure sale, is entitled to the possession of the same and to the rents and profits, after notice to quit and a demand for the rents and profits has been made. A purchaser from the mortgagee during the period of redemption has the same rights as the mortgagee. North American Trust Co. v. Burrow,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gailey v. RickettsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. North American Trust Co. v. BurrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Tallman v. HeuckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deming Investment Co. v. Bank of JudsoniaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Bank of Weiner v. Jonesboro Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. O'Connell v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. State Life Insurance v. GraueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API