Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wailuku Sugar Co. v. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1901Published

Appeal prom Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

FR'EAR, C.J.

I respectfully dissent. The words “e pili ana” mean “joining,” “coinciding” or “uniting with” and are at least the equivalent of the word “along.” The word “kahawai,” although it may etymologically mean “water-mark” and may be used to denote a. dry gulch in which there was formerly a stream, undoubtedly was used here in the sense of “stream.” The bo mdary would, then, be described (translating) as: “South 36° West 1.22 chains along the stream.”

It is true, the words “e pili ana” are used in describing the other boundaries as being along adjoining lands and, of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gouverneur v. National Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Lampman v. Van AlstyneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. C. Notley & Sons v. Kukaiau Plantation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API