Pupillo v. Eakin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
This is an action in tort wherein plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek to recover damages —she for personal injuries and he for property damage and medical expenses incurred for treatment of his wife.
The injuries and damages were allegedly sustained in a collision between plaintiffs’ automobile, operated at the time by the wife, accompanied by three minor daughters, and the vehicle of the defendant, Eakin, who as the driver, was accompanied by two companions.
The collision is characterized as a rear-end collision in which plaintiffs’ automobile struck the rear of defendant’s car.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gandy v. ArrantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Adams v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Pupillo v. EakinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Poleman v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Pierce v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Strother v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pupillo v. EakinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Staehle v. MarinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967