Legal Opinion

Styborski v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Frank Styborski, appellee, instituted this action in assumpsit to recover for damages to Ms barn under the provisions of a policy of insurance issued by Hartford Fire Insurance Co., appellant, insuring appellee against loss by windstorm. A jury rendered a verdict for the appellee in the amount of $1,500.00, and the insurer now appeals from the dismissal of its motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v.

Appellant, contends that the evidence is insufficient to warrant the submission of the case to a jury, and that there was insufficient evidence offered by appellee to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marks v. Lumbermen's Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Randall Et Vir v. StagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Metz v. Travelers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Warmcastle v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Murphy Et Ux. v. Ins. Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yunker v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API