Legal Opinion

Koscielski v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1931No. 28,080PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

An automobile (Chevrolet sedan) with five passengers therein was struck by one of defendant’s freight cars at a railway crossing in Owen, Wisconsin, at approximately 11:88 p. m. on July 14, 1928. Three actions were instituted to recover damages for injuries resulting from the accident; the cases were tried together. Two of the actions were brought by two ladies who with a man were riding in the back seat of the sedan; the other was brought by the appellant here, who was riding in the right-hand side of the front seat with the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. SandersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Howe v. CoreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Roth v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bahlert v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Twist v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API