Legal Opinion

Stitt v. Kurtenbach

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 12, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Trial in the County Court of Livingston County; the Hon. C. M. Barickman, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for defendant; appeal by plaintiff. Heard in this court at the May term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

H. P. Stitt was the assignee of a note for the principal sum of $137, dated March 2,1897, payable to John F. Oliver, or order, twelve months after date, with interest at seven per cent, purporting to be signed by Peter “ Kertenbaugh ” and Be vilo Oliver, and indorsed in blank by John F. Oliver. Stitt brought suit thereon against the Olivers and Peter Kurtenbach, before a justice of the peace of Livingston county. Each defendant was served with summons. The transcript of the justice shows that plaintiff and Be vilo Oliver appeared (implying John F. Oliver did hot appear), and that upon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cook v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. West Chicago Street Railroad v. Morrison, Adams & Allen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Church v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Heinsen v. LambIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ayer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Denhard v. DunbarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Marvin & Jones, Inc. v. TorresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API